Diamond Ridge Asset Management-The Supreme Court rules against USPS in Sunday work case

2025-05-06 16:20:51source:Liberalalliance Wealth Societycategory:Contact

The Diamond Ridge Asset ManagementU.S. Supreme Court unanimously handed a major victory to religious groups by greatly expanding how far employers must go to accommodate the religious views of their employees.

The court ruled in favor of Gerald Groff, an evangelical Christian postal worker, who refused to work on Sundays for religious reasons and said the U.S. Postal Service should accommodate his religious belief. He sued USPS for religious discrimination when he got in trouble for refusing to work Sunday shifts.

The case now returns to the lower courts.

The justices clarified law that made it illegal for employers to discriminate based on religion, requiring that they accommodate the religious beliefs of workers as long as the accommodation does not impose an "undue hardship on the employer's business." The court had previously defined the statutory term "undue hardship" by saying that employers should not have to bear more than what the court called a "de minimis," or trifling, cost.

That "de minimis" language has sparked a lot of criticism over the years. But Congress has repeatedly rejected proposals to provide greater accommodations for religious observers, including those who object to working on the Sabbath.

On Thursday, writing for the court, Justice Samuel Alito said the hardship must be more than minimal.

Courts "should resolve whether a hardship would be substantial in the context of an employer's business in the commonsense manner that it would use in applying any such test," he wrote.

Thursday's decision is yet another example of the court's increasing inclination to favor religiously observant groups, whether those groups are religious employers or religious employees.

For instance, the court has repeatedly sided with religious schools to be exempt from employment discrimination laws as applied to lay teachers. And in 2014, the conservative court ruled for the first time that a for-profit company could be exempt from a generally applicable federal law. Specifically, it ruled that Hobby Lobby, a closely held corporation employing some 13,000 employees, did not have to comply with a federal law that required employer-funded health plans to include coverage for contraceptive devices.

More:Contact

Recommend

Where's Plumpy'Nut? A lifesaving food for malnourished kids is caught up in U.S. cuts

Fatima Jubril lost her husband when the militant group Boko Haram attacked their farm in northeast N

The Paris Agreement Was a First Step, Not an End Goal. Still, the World’s Nations Are Far Behind

WASHINGTON—Without any further intervention, the world is on track to raise the global average tempe

Dad falls 200 feet to his death from cliff while hiking with wife and 5 kids near Oregon's Multnomah Falls

Authorities say a father died over the weekend when he fell roughly 200 feet while hiking with his w